<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of Bing is not in search.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplyzesty.com/news/future-bing-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplyzesty.com/news/future-bing-search/</link>
	<description>Building your brand through social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:31:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyzesty.com/news/future-bing-search/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplyzesty.com/?p=4741#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>Hi, I agree with what you&#039;re saying. I think the power for Bing here, if they do sign publishers up, is not to keep the content strictly available through Bing. If they can develop a decent aggregation of news, I think the interest lies in what they&#039;ll do with that and where it will be made available. I don&#039;t think people will switch to Bing for search directly, so they need to take their product out to different sites to encourage people to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I agree with what you&#8217;re saying. I think the power for Bing here, if they do sign publishers up, is not to keep the content strictly available through Bing. If they can develop a decent aggregation of news, I think the interest lies in what they&#8217;ll do with that and where it will be made available. I don&#8217;t think people will switch to Bing for search directly, so they need to take their product out to different sites to encourage people to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyzesty.com/news/future-bing-search/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplyzesty.com/?p=4741#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>A tie between news publishers and search companies for exclusivity for their content is a worrying possibility.

 It seems like a general move backwards for the web with mass fragmentation of information across the web although content would be made available that might not of been. 
 
If restrictions are put in place so only content from a subscription  or having to search through say bing then people may just look for another source for their information not suddenly swap their allegiance to debatably an inferior search product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tie between news publishers and search companies for exclusivity for their content is a worrying possibility.</p>
<p> It seems like a general move backwards for the web with mass fragmentation of information across the web although content would be made available that might not of been. </p>
<p>If restrictions are put in place so only content from a subscription  or having to search through say bing then people may just look for another source for their information not suddenly swap their allegiance to debatably an inferior search product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
